Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / Which Action Shows a Distinctive Characteristic Ascribed to Typical Asian American Families?

Which Action Shows a Distinctive Characteristic Ascribed to Typical Asian American Families?

Ascribed characteristics, as used in the social sciences, refers to properties of an individual attained at birth, by inheritance, or through the aging procedure. The individual has very little, if any, control over these characteristics.[1] Typical examples include race, ethnicity, gender, caste, height, and appearance.[2] The term is apt for describing characteristics chiefly caused past "nature" (due east.thou. genetics) and for those chiefly caused by "nurture" (east.thou. parenting during early childhood), encounter: Nature versus nurture.

Use within census

Demography being the statistical written report of populations requires the ability to differentiate between populations. Most populations self-accredit themselves equally being different than another by the creation of a country.[iii] This allows demographers to draw lines between countries and compare them. However useful, countries have significant complex populations that require more exacting definitions. Commonly seen are uses of race, gender and ethnicity. In the scope of academic demography, all of these are social constructs, ascribed to groups or individuals for stratification.[4] [v] With these theories in place, many new theories can be formed and data nerveless to either testify or disprove them. Ascribed characteristics tin can have big by-products atmospheric condition perceived or not. Discussed below are race, gender, social condition / caste and hiring / promotion.

Race

Ascribed characteristics are non always used for academic purposes. People with sure ascribed characteristics can be systematically treated with prejudice. Thus, the study of racism can be seen, at least superficially, as the study of the ways that people with a sure skin color and cultural background are systematically treated differently by society at big.[6]

Gender

Frank van Tubergen studied the how ascribed characteristics and achieved characteristics affect their social capital in the article "Personal networks in Saudi arabia: The role of ascribed and accomplished characteristics".[seven] The commodity highlighted that women have less social capital than men in Saudi Arabia citing specifically that it was "due to fewer non-family connections". There are many arguments that stem from disagreements over the definition of what is a fact when information technology comes to gender, showing the fluidity of ascribed characteristics. For case, people who notice homosexuality morally objectionable may attempt to justify this by insisting that homosexuals brand a conscious decision most the nature of the sexual desire they experience; nonetheless, information technology would difficult to condemn homosexuality if homosexuality was predetermined, either genetically or from early childhood.[eight] (Meet Sexual orientation.) Both groups do, however, use the term nonetheless, merely ascribing unlike definitions to those individuals.

Many different societies accept had varying types of social stratification both historically and in the mod era. One of the most obvious examples is India, and its caste system. In its essence, it was a arrangement that ascribed sweepers the lowest condition, making this i group literally untouchable, although India officially states that bigotry confronting lower castes is illegal.[9]

Hiring / promotion

Ronald P. Dore was a British sociologist that was a specialist in the Japanese economy. His view volition exist expressed here. In his largest work, British Factory, Japanese Factory,[10] Dore investigates whether decisions on hiring and promotion, in the Japanese business firm Hitachi, over a particular time were based chiefly on "achievement" or chiefly on "ascribed characteristics". The context of the discussion implied that accomplishment-based decisions are skillful, while those based on ascribed characteristics are bad. His discussion admits explicitly and, implicitly, that there are several complications to moral judgement that include:

  • Some achievement characteristics are positively correlated with some ascribed characteristics such equally intelligence and socioeconomic success.[xi] For example, "the power to command...may be much more likely to be bred in upper course families" to the extent that "the power to command" is viewed as a mensurate of merit. Promotion decisions favoring high merit would not exist entirely distinguishable from making promotion decisions favoring loftier class thus, it can be difficult, to tell whether a particular promotion determination has been made for simply or unjust reasons.
  • Information technology is possible to, "irrelevantly acquire discriminatory characteristics", or even exercise and then intentionally. For example, past converting to a new religion or getting married.
  • Information technology is reasonable to view even some ascribed characteristics as factors that should bear upon employee compensation. In Hitachi, for example, pay is positively correlated both with performance and with historic period. The latter is an ascribed characteristic, simply Dore suggests that it is a perfectly reasonable consideration, especially since expenses such as childcare, tend to increment over the duration of employment at Hitachi.

Dore besides points out that what counts equally an ascribed characteristic can vary depending on context. In evaluating the fairness of hiring standards, he viewed an bidder's success in the educational organization as a skilful approximation of achievement. Thus, he noted that hiring decisions at Hitachi, during the time of his study, were "regulated by very strict qualification standards" and non very significantly influenced past ascribed characteristics. When he turned to evaluate opportunities for advancement within the house, nevertheless, Dore noted that "educational qualifications...limit the range of posts which i can attain", pregnant even if one'south level of achievement increases, 1 may yet be kept down by a relative lack of achievement in the educational organisation. Therefore, in investigating opportunities for promotions, educational achievement "the two get another form of ascribed characteristic."[12] These additional forms of ascribed characteristics expand on the definition of an ascribed characteristic assuasive for information technology to have more applications.

References

  1. ^ Ferrante, Joan (2007). Sociology: A Global Perspective. Cengage Learning. p. 200.
  2. ^ Weeks, John Robert (2015-01-01). Population : an introduction to concepts and bug (Twelfth ed.). Boston, MA: Cenage. ISBN9781305094505. OCLC 884617656.
  3. ^ "Milestones: 1945–1952 - Office of the Historian". history.land.gov . Retrieved 2018-04-eleven .
  4. ^ "Race and Racial Identity Are Social Constructs". Retrieved 2018-04-11 .
  5. ^ Lindsey, Linda (December 2014). Gender roles : a sociological perspective (6th ed.). Boston. ISBN9780205899685. OCLC 892213147.
  6. ^ Resigl, Martin; Wodak, Ruth (2005). Discourse and Bigotry: Rhetorics Of Racism and Antisemitism. Routledge. pp. eleven–14.
  7. ^ van Tubergen, Frank; Al-Modaf, Obaid Ali; Almosaed, Nora F.; Al-Ghamdi, Mohammed Ben Said (2016). "Personal networks in Saudi Arabia: The function of ascribed and achieved characteristics". Social Networks. 45: 45–54. doi:ten.1016/j.socnet.2015.10.007.
  8. ^ Rahman, Q; Wilson, G.D (2003). "Sexual orientation and the second to quaternary finger length ratio: evidence for organising effects of sex hormones or developmental instability?". International Society of Psychoneuroendocrinology. 28 (3): 288–303. doi:ten.1016/S0306-4530(02)00022-7. PMID 12573297.
  9. ^ [1]Law-breaking AGAINST PERSONS BELONGING TO SCs / STsGovernment of Bharat, National Offense Records Agency (2011), page 108
  10. ^ Dore, Ronald (1973). British factory, Japanese factory : the origins of national variety in industrial relations. Berkeley: Academy of California Press. ISBN9780520024953. OCLC 20130326.
  11. ^ Strenze, Tarmo (2007-09-01). "Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research". Intelligence. 35 (v): 401–426. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.004.
  12. ^ Hearn, James C. (1988). "Attendance at higher-cost colleges: Ascribed, socioeconomic, and academic influences on student enrollment patterns". Economics of Educational activity Review. 7 (1): 65–76. doi:ten.1016/0272-7757(88)90072-6.

This page was concluding edited on 15 December 2020, at 17:49

barffourn1938.blogspot.com

Source: https://wiki2.org/en/Ascribed_characteristics